03/10/2010 (12:18 pm)
Filed under: nappedeptrole.com edit
Say you are the top sales person at your company. There are 10 sales people on the staff. The bottom 3 sales people are jealous of you, since you earn the most money and praise. A new boss comes along and decides that you should share more of the quality sales leads you developed with those bottom 3 to give them a chance to make some extra money. How would you react to this? Does it seem fair to you knowing that it will probably cost you money? I would quit. Does this scenario seem like the Obama Tax plan?Obama-083 workers don't equal out to the 5% out of ten workers. there are more poor and middle class people than rich .I had to laugh at *say you are a rich Republican*
Most of the Republican's I know are far from Rich..
this shows the lack of understanding of the DemocratsIt happens, you either quit and make no money or do your job. They could even change the rules entirely and move to salaries where everyone make the same and you can only make more money by working more hours.
No that scenario doesn't match the Obama tax plan at all... because the money isn't going to other people its going to the government to pay for the war and the bail out that saving all the rich people behinds isn't it. I don't know many poor people with 401ks... do you?
Take from the prosperous give to the jobless. Yep sounds like an Obama plan to me which he admitted to on O'Reilly.That doesn't sound like the tax plan.That sounds more like what got us into the mess that just cost us 700 billion +-.Yeah, the rich are scum. These captilist should be destroyed so socialism can set us free as a fair country.Yes it does. It is a perfect example of socialism and the redistribution of wealth.
McCain-Palin '08
Our future depends on it.Yes it does.
McCain/Palin'08I would find a new job.
And a better president.
McCain!What I find hilarious is that this is exactly what most companies do. That way all of the company's salespeople are better at their jobs because 1) the ones not doing as well learn from those that do better, and 2) the people doing well learn how to manage and train others.
In response to your question to Drixnot: I do happen to know plenty of poor people that sign paychecks. They're called the working poor.How much money has the Republican Congress and Republican President Bush cost the American taxpayers with the bailouts for Corporate America, the two wars in the Middle East and the average Joe paying when the wealthy continue to get tax breaks.
Obama-Biden 08Obama is only taxing the rich and the rich can afford it, and no, it is not going to hurt them to help others go to college, and get health care. Go ahead and give me a thumbs down if you are a selfish idiot. Say you're a Rich Republican [word redundancy?].Adam & Sam are given the chance to earn their own Cherry Pie. The rules are simple. They have to work all week, 40 hours, then at the end of the week, they are rewarded with their own Cherry Pie.
Adam, works all week.
Sam, doesn't feel like working.
At the end of the week, Adam earns his own Cherry Pie.
Now Sam, seeing the rewards that Adam got gets upset. Sam wants his own Cherry Pie or atleast a piece of it.
Adam doesn't want to share. He worked all week for it, why would he want to share it?Yes, it is a simple analogy, but not altogether wrong. And if you are the top sales guy, you could quit. But, if you quit, where would you go that would give you the same opportunity? And, from the CEO's perspective is it wrong to ask the top sales person to offload some leads, and to challenge him to find more. It will probably make for a better business. Yes, the bottom performers make a few more bucks, but the top person rises to the challenge and still makes far more. But the business grows faster.
Look at the 90's when this was put into practice. Taxes were raised on the top income earners. The economy grew for 9 straight years, job growth was spectacular, and the deficits became surpluses. It is only 9 years, but it worked. Reagan's two terms worked too, except for one thing: the national debt exploded. That's the one fallacy of Reaganomics that has been proven solidly during Reagan's administration, and now again in the Bush years. Given the worldwide credit crisis, we can't ignore deficits anymore, pretending that tax cuts generate more revenue. The data just doesn't support that idea.#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |
|